<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TSA reaches out to the Identity Project</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.papersplease.org/wp/2010/06/22/tsa-reaches-out-to-the-identity-project/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.papersplease.org/wp/2010/06/22/tsa-reaches-out-to-the-identity-project/</link>
	<description>Challenging ID Demands</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 04:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Papers, Please! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; DHS responds to our complaints of human rights treaty violations</title>
		<link>http://www.papersplease.org/wp/2010/06/22/tsa-reaches-out-to-the-identity-project/#comment-477109</link>
		<dc:creator>Papers, Please! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; DHS responds to our complaints of human rights treaty violations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 00:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.papersplease.org/wp/?p=1990#comment-477109</guid>
		<description>[...] email to TSA OCRL asking who has been designated as the single contact officer for implementation of... (June 22, 2010) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] email to TSA OCRL asking who has been designated as the single contact officer for implementation of&#8230; (June 22, 2010) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coverage continues &#8230; &#171; Computers, Freedom, and Privacy</title>
		<link>http://www.papersplease.org/wp/2010/06/22/tsa-reaches-out-to-the-identity-project/#comment-140892</link>
		<dc:creator>Coverage continues &#8230; &#171; Computers, Freedom, and Privacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 19:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.papersplease.org/wp/?p=1990#comment-140892</guid>
		<description>[...] ends with some thoughts on CFP&#8217;s value and its &#8220;unlimited potential to create contact between worlds which are usually alienated from one another to share their perspectives and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ends with some thoughts on CFP&#8217;s value and its &#8220;unlimited potential to create contact between worlds which are usually alienated from one another to share their perspectives and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BeatTheChip</title>
		<link>http://www.papersplease.org/wp/2010/06/22/tsa-reaches-out-to-the-identity-project/#comment-140737</link>
		<dc:creator>BeatTheChip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 17:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.papersplease.org/wp/?p=1990#comment-140737</guid>
		<description>We really admire your approaches on issues of International privacy.  Someone needs to ask these questions. Especially when our Bill of Rights are being treated as manageable policy instead of static conditions of the American identity.  The rights themselves are buoyant over any national security agendas.  They aren't secondary. They aren't in a pile of either-or options.  National Security personnel have great challenges to overcome but personal rights of the American flyer is not one of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We really admire your approaches on issues of International privacy.  Someone needs to ask these questions. Especially when our Bill of Rights are being treated as manageable policy instead of static conditions of the American identity.  The rights themselves are buoyant over any national security agendas.  They aren&#8217;t secondary. They aren&#8217;t in a pile of either-or options.  National Security personnel have great challenges to overcome but personal rights of the American flyer is not one of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil Mocek</title>
		<link>http://www.papersplease.org/wp/2010/06/22/tsa-reaches-out-to-the-identity-project/#comment-140685</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil Mocek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 07:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.papersplease.org/wp/?p=1990#comment-140685</guid>
		<description>It has been more than one year since I &lt;a href="http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/travel-safety-security/958795-tsa-sop-re-airport-id-requirements-provided-idp-via-foia-request.html#post11820169" rel="nofollow"&gt;submitted a FOIA request (TSA09-0624) for TSA's screening management SOP manual&lt;/a&gt;.  They have yet to fulfill the request.

Status updates have been as follows:


On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 11:05:08AM -0400, TSA FOIA wrote:
&#62; We are diligently processing your FOIA request.  Due to the increasing
&#62; number of FOIA request received by this office; we have encountered
&#62; some delay in processing your request.

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 09:49:26AM -0400, TSA FOIA wrote:
&#62; We are currently processing your case.

On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 07:53:35AM -0500, TSA FOIA wrote:
&#62; Your file is currently being review by another component.

On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 11:02:12AM -0500, TSA FOIA wrote:
&#62; Your FOIA case was forwarded for internal review on November 23, 2009.
&#62; [...] Your request is in the "internal review" process.

On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:14:44AM -0500, TSA FOIA wrote:
&#62; Your FOIA has been processed and is currently in the "internal review"
&#62; process.  Once the internal review is completed a response will be
&#62; sent to you as soon as possible.

On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 02:04:53PM -0500, TSA FOIA wrote:
&#62; Your FOIA has been processed and is currently being reviewed by TSA
&#62; management before a response can be sent to you.

 On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 04:00:40PM -0400, TSA FOIA wrote:
&#62; Your request is currently being processed.

On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 09:09:07AM -0400, TSA FOIA wrote:
&#62; Your FOIA request is currently in management review.

Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 11:50:57 -0400
From: "Janet, Kevin " 
To: Phillip Mocek
Subject: RE: [SEVENTH REQUEST] Re: FOIA: request status of TSA09-0624
         (placed June, 2009)

Mr. Mocek, I apologize for the delay in responding but TSA's response to
this request is still pending final review and concurrence.  Regarding
your four questions: (1) Processing was completed in January.  The April
reference to "processing" incorporated the final review process - not
reprocessing the records.  (2) As noted above, the review process is
ongoing. (3) Unfortunately I cannot estimate when this process will be
completed.  (4) By "fulfilled" I am assuming you mean TSA's release of
the requested record. No decision has been made regarding releasability.

-----Original Message-----
From: Phillip Mocek
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 7:08 PM
To: Kevin Janet - TSA FOIA Officer 
Cc: TSA FOIA Office , DHS FOIA Office ,
    Mary Ellen Callahan - DHS Chief FOIA Officer
    , "Robert S. Bray - TSA Acting Deputy
    Administrator" , Gale Rossides - TSA Acting
    Administrator 
Subject: [SEVENTH REQUEST] Re: FOIA: request status of TSA09-0624
         (placed June, 2009)

Mr. Janet:

Could you please answer the questions I asked on April 6, then
repeated on April 13, April 23, April 27, May 3, and May 10?
Those were:

 1. In January, you reported that my request had been processed.
    Was that implication that it was no longer being processed
    incorrect, or is it presently being processed a second time?
    (On April 6, you wrote that the request was being processed.)

 2. Has the internal review process that began on November 23,
    2009, that which was still happening on December 4, 2009, and
    was still happening on January 25, 2010, been completed?

Also:

 3. When do you estimate that the management review you described
    as underway on April 27, 2010, will be completed?

 4. Will my request be fulfilled once the management review is
    completed?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has been more than one year since I <a href="http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/travel-safety-security/958795-tsa-sop-re-airport-id-requirements-provided-idp-via-foia-request.html#post11820169" rel="nofollow">submitted a FOIA request (TSA09-0624) for TSA&#8217;s screening management SOP manual</a>.  They have yet to fulfill the request.</p>
<p>Status updates have been as follows:</p>
<p>On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 11:05:08AM -0400, TSA FOIA wrote:<br />
&gt; We are diligently processing your FOIA request.  Due to the increasing<br />
&gt; number of FOIA request received by this office; we have encountered<br />
&gt; some delay in processing your request.</p>
<p>On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 09:49:26AM -0400, TSA FOIA wrote:<br />
&gt; We are currently processing your case.</p>
<p>On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 07:53:35AM -0500, TSA FOIA wrote:<br />
&gt; Your file is currently being review by another component.</p>
<p>On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 11:02:12AM -0500, TSA FOIA wrote:<br />
&gt; Your FOIA case was forwarded for internal review on November 23, 2009.<br />
&gt; [...] Your request is in the &#8220;internal review&#8221; process.</p>
<p>On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:14:44AM -0500, TSA FOIA wrote:<br />
&gt; Your FOIA has been processed and is currently in the &#8220;internal review&#8221;<br />
&gt; process.  Once the internal review is completed a response will be<br />
&gt; sent to you as soon as possible.</p>
<p>On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 02:04:53PM -0500, TSA FOIA wrote:<br />
&gt; Your FOIA has been processed and is currently being reviewed by TSA<br />
&gt; management before a response can be sent to you.</p>
<p> On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 04:00:40PM -0400, TSA FOIA wrote:<br />
&gt; Your request is currently being processed.</p>
<p>On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 09:09:07AM -0400, TSA FOIA wrote:<br />
&gt; Your FOIA request is currently in management review.</p>
<p>Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 11:50:57 -0400<br />
From: &#8220;Janet, Kevin &#8221;<br />
To: Phillip Mocek<br />
Subject: RE: [SEVENTH REQUEST] Re: FOIA: request status of TSA09-0624<br />
         (placed June, 2009)</p>
<p>Mr. Mocek, I apologize for the delay in responding but TSA&#8217;s response to<br />
this request is still pending final review and concurrence.  Regarding<br />
your four questions: (1) Processing was completed in January.  The April<br />
reference to &#8220;processing&#8221; incorporated the final review process - not<br />
reprocessing the records.  (2) As noted above, the review process is<br />
ongoing. (3) Unfortunately I cannot estimate when this process will be<br />
completed.  (4) By &#8220;fulfilled&#8221; I am assuming you mean TSA&#8217;s release of<br />
the requested record. No decision has been made regarding releasability.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8211;Original Message&#8212;&#8211;<br />
From: Phillip Mocek<br />
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 7:08 PM<br />
To: Kevin Janet - TSA FOIA Officer<br />
Cc: TSA FOIA Office , DHS FOIA Office ,<br />
    Mary Ellen Callahan - DHS Chief FOIA Officer<br />
    , &#8220;Robert S. Bray - TSA Acting Deputy<br />
    Administrator&#8221; , Gale Rossides - TSA Acting<br />
    Administrator<br />
Subject: [SEVENTH REQUEST] Re: FOIA: request status of TSA09-0624<br />
         (placed June, 2009)</p>
<p>Mr. Janet:</p>
<p>Could you please answer the questions I asked on April 6, then<br />
repeated on April 13, April 23, April 27, May 3, and May 10?<br />
Those were:</p>
<p> 1. In January, you reported that my request had been processed.<br />
    Was that implication that it was no longer being processed<br />
    incorrect, or is it presently being processed a second time?<br />
    (On April 6, you wrote that the request was being processed.)</p>
<p> 2. Has the internal review process that began on November 23,<br />
    2009, that which was still happening on December 4, 2009, and<br />
    was still happening on January 25, 2010, been completed?</p>
<p>Also:</p>
<p> 3. When do you estimate that the management review you described<br />
    as underway on April 27, 2010, will be completed?</p>
<p> 4. Will my request be fulfilled once the management review is<br />
    completed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

